Returning back to the Anthropic compiler attempt: one of the steps that the agent failed was the one that was more strongly related to the idea of memorization of what is in the pretraining set: the assembler. With extensive documentation, I can’t see any way Claude Code (and, even more, GPT5.3-codex, which is in my experience, for complex stuff, more capable) could fail at producing a working assembler, since it is quite a mechanical process. This is, I think, in contradiction with the idea that LLMs are memorizing the whole training set and uncompress what they have seen. LLMs can memorize certain over-represented documents and code, but while they can extract such verbatim parts of the code if prompted to do so, they don’t have a copy of everything they saw during the training set, nor they spontaneously emit copies of already seen code, in their normal operation. We mostly ask LLMs to create work that requires assembling different knowledge they possess, and the result is normally something that uses known techniques and patterns, but that is new code, not constituting a copy of some pre-existing code.
# Switch to agent mode
，推荐阅读同城约会获取更多信息
1.5#楼附着式升降脚手架的架体集中堆载建筑材料，超过专项施工方案设计允许堆载值。（违反《房屋与市政工程生产安全重大事故隐患判定标准（2024版）》第十四条第三款，属于重大事故隐患。），更多细节参见heLLoword翻译官方下载
NHK ONE ニュース トップ社会ニュース一覧富士山の山開き 静岡県内の須走ルートも7月1日に早める方針このページを見るにはご利用意向の確認をお願いします。ご利用にあたって，更多细节参见爱思助手下载最新版本